Babies Are Too Graphic?
Too graphic?!?
The Joliet Herald-News, a newspaper in Illinois, refused three separate pro-life advertisements on three separate occasions, including the one pictured here.
Why? The reason given was that the pictures were "too graphic." I'm sure that the actual reason should be much more obvious than that. The newspaper reserves the right to reject ads for any reason, so why didn't they just come out and say that these were rejected because they did not fit the media's liberal ajenda? Isn't it the liberal mindset that is frequently criticizing conservative viewpoints for being too closed-minded?
When Jill Stanek asked the advertising department what type of ad could run, she was told that pictures of already born babies could be included.
To view these "graphic" ads, you can visit the NRL ad campaign page or see them in PDF format by clicking below:
If you're interested, you can contact the Joliet Herald-News:
- Joliet Herald News
300 Caterpillar Drive
Joliet, Illinois 60436 - 815.729.6161
- Senior editor Bill Wimbiscus: bwimbiscus@scn1.com
Related posts: