Grating Ratings: Third in a Trilogy, Part 2 of 4

29 July 2007

Here are some movies that are the third of three in its series:

  • Back to the Future Part III: C+ A decent film, but not nearly as good as the first two. Though the plot picks up right from the end of BTTF2, it seems like a completely disconnected storyline.
  • Naked Gun 33⅓: The Final Insult: A- Leslie Neilsen could keep pumping this stuff out until he is 110 at the same quality.
  • Look Who's Talking Now: D The two original movies were different from all those stupid talking animal movies because it featured talking babies After running out of material for that gag through two movies, they apparently decided to fall back on the standard talking animals.
  • The Matrix Revolutions: B- The original Matrix was a truly great movie and left us wanting more. Sometimes it's best if that's the end of the story. The plot did get to play its One/Jesus analogy out in this final film, but after this one, we weren't wanting more.
  • The NeverEnding Story III: B- There's a little more leniency with children's movies. (After all, they've made twelve The Land Before Time videos!) You could probably keep telling stories from this fantasy universe for decades to come . . . but just because you can, doesn't mean you should.

Please feel free to leave a comment. What do you agree or disagree with, and why?

Blogathon Game: Wild!

29 July 2007

The current game on the official Blogathon page asks us to draw or otherwise produce a picture of your favorite wild animal.

My favorite wild animal is Domo-Kun:
Domo-Kun chasing Cliche-kitty
Come on, Domo-Kun, run faster! You need your sustenance!

. . . I'm now wondering if this might hurt my status with frykitty, the pro-LOLCATS Blogathon queen.

Posted by Novac in All, Blogathon, Blogathon 2007, Charity

Grating Ratings: Third in a Trilogy, Part 1 of 4

29 July 2007

Here are some movies that are the third of three in its series:

  • Godfather Part III: D- This is the classic "ruining a classic series by making one too many". The Godfather Part II was a great sequel and even won six Oscars . . . and then they had to go and make this.
  • Honey, We Shrunk Ourselves: F Execs knew this was a lousy idea, I think, so that's probably why it went straight to video. They did shrinking, then they did enlargening. And now we're back to shrinking again? Been there, done that.
  • Major League: Back to the Minors: C+ This one isn't up there with the original, but it really wasn't that bad a movie for its genre. The only real problem is the oxy moron between the title and the subtitle.
  • Naqoyqatsi: A- If you enjoyed Koyaanisqatsi and Powaqqatsi, this one lives up to the same standards.
  • Spy Kids 3-D: Game Over: C- This one really played like a direct-to-video film. It lacked the luster of the first two Spy Kids movies.

Please feel free to leave a comment. What do you agree or disagree with, and why?

Blogathon Game: Collecting Collections

29 July 2007

For the latest game on the official Blogathon site, the question is: Do you collect anything? What is it, and why?

I collect movie ticket stubs from movies I have gone to. I suppose it's simply a unique log of my life. A few stubs stick out more than others in my mind:

  • There's the Wayne's World ticket stub I got when I went and didn't see Wayne's World.
  • There are the three Back to the Future movies I have stubs for — I took my mom to see them all because they came out around her birthday.
  • There's the ticket stub for Pay It Forward, the first movie I saw with my then-girlfriend, now-wife.
  • There's the most recent ticket stub I have for Blades of Glory, the not-so-romantic movie from my most recent anniversary getaway with my wife.

Lots of big memories on little pieces of paper.

Grating Ratings: Telephone Features

29 July 2007
  • Call Waiting: B+ Call waiting is a great feature because you don't have to worry if being on the phone is blocking someone else from calling. This is especially handy if you have a teenage girl in your house. Coupled with caller ID, this feature is even better because you know if it's worth the while to switch over or not. Coupled with Caller ID on TV, I can see an incoming call and who it's from, even if my wife is talking on the phone already.
  • Caller ID: A (Caller ID on TV: A+) Caller ID is great. Unlike *69, you get to know who it is before you answer the phone. We no longer had to screen calls via the answering machine message. Plus, it seems that anyone I wanted to talk to never left messages on the machine, so I just never talked to anyone. With the advent of Caller ID on TV, I'm in heaven. When the phone rings, all I have to do is look at the TV (assuming it's on) to see who is calling. No more jumping off the couch to see who's calling!
  • Last Call Return (*69): D This may have been useful in the days before caller ID was widely available. Now, it's just outdated.
  • Three-Way Calling: C- Three-way calling is overrated. Its only practical use is at work for conference calls, and I'm not even sure if those are considered three-way calling. Outside that, the feature is reserved for teenagers with nothing better to do. If you really did want to use three-way calling to talk to two people, you spend five minutes just trying to make sure you got the person on the line without dropping the initial caller.
  • Voice mail: B Voice mail on its own would probably score much better, but we already had the answering machine. The pros and cons between the two really just balance each other out.

Please feel free to leave a comment. What do you agree or disagree with, and why? Which items do you wish were included that I didn't cover here?

Posted by Novac in All, Blogathon, Blogathon 2007, Charity, Ratings

Déjà Vu

29 July 2007

We're now 34 posts into Blogathon, and the time really flies by — mostly because there's not much time to think about how long you've been blogging without a rest!

At this point, my body is getting a bit drowsy. Normally I'm still fine at 1:30, but staring at a computer screen and sitting in a computer chair for a large majority of over 16 hours can really wear you down.

I've also noticed that I've done so much blogging that I am now thinking, "Did I already post about that? Naah, I don't think so — or did I? I can't remember. And why am I talking to myself?"

Posted by Novac in All, Blog, Blogathon, Blogathon 2007, Charity

Grating Ratings: Scooby Doo Guest Stars

29 July 2007

Why and how Scooby Doo got so many guest stars is beyond me. Just to clarify: Technically, the show in question here is The New Scooby-Doo Movies. Here are five guests who appeared on Scooby Doo:

  • Batman and Robin: D When you're bringing on other fictional characters from another television series, you know you're scraping the bottom of the barrel for guest stars. Perhaps it made for good entertainment for the kids, but it's just a lousy match-up. A superhero millionaire hanging out with a bunch of hippie kids? Ack.
  • Don Knotts: B Don Knotts appeared as his usual bumbling character, being comical in a butt-of-the-joke manner. It worked out well enough, though I thought Don was always drawn more realistically than the rest of the characters on the show.
  • Harlem Globetrotters: A- The Harlem Globetrotters were a treat. There were so many of them, you really only knew Curly. They kept the action going and provided a bunch of laughs. The only problem is that their whole shtick is basketball tricks. In the cartoons, Scooby can perform those same tricks!
  • Sonny and Cher: C+ I was never a fan of Cher, and I'm not sure the duo came across all that well in Scooby Doo, either.
  • The Three Stooges: B+ Somehow, the Three Stooges' slapstick carried over to animation when they appeared on the show. It wasn't quite as edgy as the Three Stooges episodes, but they got the job done.

Please feel free to leave a comment. What do you agree or disagree with, and why? Which Scooby Doo guest stars do you wish were included that I didn't cover here?